Group 1: same same but different
--> unique way of presenting (uses prezi instead of the norm, powerpoint)
--> loud and clear voice
--> can have more link between main topic and content
--> the video was excellent! sadly it is not considered as part of the presentation as it is not related to the topic
Group 2: old is better than new
--> attempts to interact with audience however does not interact with the slides
--> words are unable to be seen in certain slides, messy
--> voice is not loud enough
--> those who are presenting are not paying attention, talking among themselves
--> a mix of good and bad
Group 3: same same but different
--> a lot of research done
--> however, should have more link to the trip to China instead of using secondary sources
--> reflection can have more link to the topic and does not have to be put separately in other words there should not be one slide just for reflection
--> unique way of presenting (I.e. use graphs)
Group 5: friend or foe
--> very nice powerpoint slides, appropriate ways of representing info (I.e. Tables)
--> teamwork of team is very good! slides and speaker is in sync most of the time
--> refer to script too much, less eye contact
Group 6: old is better than new
--> made the effort to memorise their script
--> unique stand (old and new can coexist)
--> could have more interaction with audience
