Thursday, 22 May 2014
SHANGHAI's ECONOMY!
Tuesday, 13 May 2014
Sunday, 4 May 2014
Reflection — China's dilemma
Reflection on China's dilemma between pursuing higher economic growth and escalating pollution due to industrialization
China’s economy
China is also the largest exporterand second largest importer of goods in the world. China is the largest manufacturing economy in the world, outpacing its world rival in this category, the service-driven economy of the United States of America. ASEAN–China Free Trade Area came into effect on 1 January 2010. China-Switzerland FTA is China's first FTA with a major European economy, while China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement came in effect in 2007 is the first FTA signed with a South Asian state. The economy of China is the fastest growing consumer market in the world.
However, China cannot have the best of both worlds. While they are pursuing a higher econimc growth, they also have a pay of price – pollution due to the industrialization. China is in a dilemma between pursuing a higher econimc growth and escalating pollution due to the industrialization.
In my opionion, I think it is much more important to reduce pollution as these pollution will affect us and our future generations. Pollution in exchange for a higher economic growth is not worth it.
Pollution is one aspect of the broader topic of environmental issues in China. Various forms of pollution have increased as China has industrialized, which has caused widespread environmental and health problems. According to the World Bank in 2007, 16 of the world's 20 most polluted cities are in China.
If they were to continue and cause even more pollution, it will just add on to the pollution and may even affect the tourism popularity of their own country as people would not want to damage their lungs, breathing in the polluted air.
Industrial pollution
Air pollution caused by industrial plants
In 1997, the World Bank issued a report by Susmita et al. targeting China's policy towards industrial pollution. The report stated that "hundreds of thousands of premature deaths and incidents of serious respiratory illness [have been] caused by exposure to industrial air pollution. Seriously contaminated by industrial discharges, many of China's waterways are largely unfit for direct human use". However, environmental regulations and industrial reforms had had some effect. Continued environmental reforms were likely to have a large effect at a modest cost.
Joseph Kahn and Jim Yardley of the New York Times in a 2007 article about China's pollution problem stated that "Environmental degradation is now so severe, with such stark domestic and international repercussions, that pollution poses not only a major long-term burden on the Chinese public but also an acute political challenge to the ruling Communist Party." Main points from the article included
A draft of a 2007 combined World Bank and SEPA report stated that up to 760,000 people died prematurely each year in China because of air and water pollution. High levels of air pollution in China's cities caused to 350,000-400,000 premature deaths. Another 300,000 died because of indoor air of poor quality. There were 60,000 premature deaths each year because of water of poor quality. Chinese officials asked that some of results should not be published in order to avoid social unrest.
Thus, in conclusion, I think that China should keep in mind the pollution they are causing instead of just caring about expanding economically.
XinXuan 2G (14)
China's dilemma (money vs passion)








